On NBC’s “Meet the Press” Sunday, President Obama blamed the deaths of four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, on inattention.
“There was just some sloppiness — not intentional — in terms of how we secure embassies in areas where you essentially don’t have governments that have a lot of capacity to protect those embassies,” Obama told David Gregory, the show’s host.
The president’s statement begs a whole host of questions, especially given the long string of cables from our foreign mission in Libya, all expressing security concerns, coupled with the protested removal of existing security personnel and the abandonment of both the British and Red Cross missions due to local terrorist activity.
Apparently, Gregory couldn’t think of a single one of those questions.
The president also said that although investigators “have some very good leads” on who carried out the Sept. 11 attack, “this is not something that I’m going to be at liberty to talk about right now.”
There are, however, other matters he should be at liberty to address.
Was the president aware of the escalating danger in Benghazi, and if not, why not?
Why wasn’t the Benghazi foreign mission made secure before Sept. 11, given all the cable traffic of al-Qaida activity in the area?
Why was security reduced under repeated protest?
Why weren’t troops deployed to assist the Foreign Service personnel during the seven-hour attack?
Who decided not to help our fellow Americans, both before and during the attack?
Who put together the talking points that the attack resulted from a protest that got out of hand, and why was this lie fed to the American people for weeks afterward, even though it was known within an hour that terrorists were responsible for the violence?
And then there’s always this burning question: “What did you know, and when did you know it?”
In November, ABC News described the pace at which the government was offering information as “the Benghazi drip-drip-drip.”
It’s still dripping.
The New York Times described the president’s “Meet the Press” responses as “his most detailed comments” on the Benghazi events to date. That may be, but they’re still not close to being detailed enough.
Watch this video of the president’s remarks on Benghazi:
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- ‘Act like a grownup’: Drunk driver sobs when she loses plea deal by coming 4 hours late to court - July 23, 2017
- ‘I would’ve fired her the day I met her’: Glenn Beck reveals more about Tomi Lahren mess - July 23, 2017
- Canadian thug beats 74-year-old cyclist bloody with a club in road rage fit– and they say US is more violent? - July 23, 2017
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.