The N.Y. Times has been caught distorting Rand Paul’s response to a question posed by uber-liberal Rachel Maddow, to suggest that he supports discrimination. For those who’ve been paying attention lately, this comes as no surprise. From the very beginning, the N.Y. Times has been a leading cheerleader for the Progressive regime now in control of the U.S. Government.
Any success for candidates associated with the tea party movement is a direct threat to the radical far left agenda of this regime. A threat that must be minimized at all costs, including journalistic integrity.
The bias and corruption in today’s media are more dangerous to the future of America than the Progressive Socialists. But for the media’s complicity, much of the destructive actions that have been taking place here of late would never have been accepted by the American people.
Here is the actual transcript –
RACHEL MADDOW, MSNBC HOST: Do you think that the private business has the right to say we don`t serve black people —
RAND PAUL: I`m not in, I`m not in — yes, I`m not in favor of any discrimination of any form.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Did Sunny Hostin just admit on air to breaking the law by voting for her son? - November 8, 2022
- Stacey Abrams justifies trailing in the polls by suggesting black men are too stupid to back her - November 7, 2022
- Kevin McCarthy has message for Pelosi telling Dems to ‘change the subject’ away from inflation - October 24, 2022
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.